<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symbian Foundation websites closed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/</link>
	<description>Random, informal Nokia blog for Nokia, Symbian, Maemo, MeeGo and Windows Phone news, reviews, rants, suggestions and applications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIP Symbian.. Or will it ever die ? &#171; Henrik Mandal on Mobile marketing and customer strategies</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-399009</link>
		<dc:creator>RIP Symbian.. Or will it ever die ? &#171; Henrik Mandal on Mobile marketing and customer strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-399009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 17-Dec-2010 : Symbian foundation website closes [source] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 17-Dec-2010 : Symbian foundation website closes [source] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bye Bye Symbian foundation &#124; YORAIT</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-25596</link>
		<dc:creator>Bye Bye Symbian foundation &#124; YORAIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-25596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 17-Dec-2010 : Symbian foundation website closes [source][/source] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 17-Dec-2010 : Symbian foundation website closes [source][/source] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Average Joe</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-25595</link>
		<dc:creator>Average Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 08:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-25595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even when the foundation was open, Symbian was de-facto closed. Less closed than Android in some aspects (feature planning was done in the open and the code repositories were freely accessible, not &quot;revealed&quot;), and more closed in others (having to order a compiler via mail from ARM ltd was a ridiculous requirement for a project seeking community contribution).

As a result of this, the feedback I saw on the symbian.org pages was more bikeshedding than helpful contribution. And when people working on real devices went there looking for help, they were redirected to Forum Nokia anyway, because marketed products were outside of the foundation&#039;s scope.

Still, the geek in me is sad that the half-open Symbian ended up becoming fully-closed instead of fully-open. But I do understand that this might be the only solution to keep Symbian standing up against its competitors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even when the foundation was open, Symbian was de-facto closed. Less closed than Android in some aspects (feature planning was done in the open and the code repositories were freely accessible, not &#8220;revealed&#8221;), and more closed in others (having to order a compiler via mail from ARM ltd was a ridiculous requirement for a project seeking community contribution).</p>
<p>As a result of this, the feedback I saw on the symbian.org pages was more bikeshedding than helpful contribution. And when people working on real devices went there looking for help, they were redirected to Forum Nokia anyway, because marketed products were outside of the foundation&#8217;s scope.</p>
<p>Still, the geek in me is sad that the half-open Symbian ended up becoming fully-closed instead of fully-open. But I do understand that this might be the only solution to keep Symbian standing up against its competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-25591</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-25591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hope so.... input from the community is a vital part o making a GOOD- to-GREAT product.

Only a few (Apple) have made it without doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope so&#8230;. input from the community is a vital part o making a GOOD- to-GREAT product.</p>
<p>Only a few (Apple) have made it without doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-25590</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-25590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its also a good way to stop your competition finding out good sources. Lets hope this helps continue to build the present Symbian!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its also a good way to stop your competition finding out good sources. Lets hope this helps continue to build the present Symbian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cod3rror</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-25589</link>
		<dc:creator>Cod3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-25589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, screw the foundation, Nokia alone being in charge will accelerate the development by a lot, hopefully.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, screw the foundation, Nokia alone being in charge will accelerate the development by a lot, hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Montano</title>
		<link>http://mynokiablog.com/2010/12/17/symbian-foundation-websites-closed/comment-page-1/#comment-25588</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Montano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mynokiablog.com/?p=17168#comment-25588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, 17th December has come so soon. What&#039;s very interesting as you have noted is Nokia&#039;s own Symbian blog.

I&#039;m not too worried about community feature implementation; I think there can be some great participation between Nokia and its users to drum up ideas on where new features should go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, 17th December has come so soon. What&#8217;s very interesting as you have noted is Nokia&#8217;s own Symbian blog.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too worried about community feature implementation; I think there can be some great participation between Nokia and its users to drum up ideas on where new features should go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: mynokiablog.com @ 2013-05-20 10:29:06 by W3 Total Cache -->