Camera Tests: Nokia N82 vs Samsung Innov8 vs Nokia N97 vs Nokia N86
Nokia and Carl Zeiss have bestowed upon the N86 imaging enhancements beyond just upping the resolution from 5MP to 8MP; wide angle, improved latency, large aperture, better sensor in general all resulting (at least on paper) in improved image quality.
As you can see from Rafe’s test, the N86 is superior in all conditions, except low light, where the N82 and its Xenon flash show exactly how to freeze time in .jpeg format.
When there’s a low light scene however, and no flash is used, the N86 is leaps and bounds beyond the other three in the tests. That’s great for:
- low light situations where xenon flash would not help because the subject is too far away
- Situations where you’re not allowed to use flash (although it would really help) – e.g. in an art gallery or music/sport event.
- when flash would produce too much gastly reflections (e.g. trying to take a photo through glass)
- when you want to take quick successive shots in low light (xenon flash takes a second or two to charge up)
- taking pictures of your pets/other animals [in low light] – they may not enjoy the sudden bright flash, of either xenon or dual led.
- [insert other reason for not using flash]
As you can see when the scene was pitch black – the N82 was able to light it up and produce vivid reds of the car, the Innov8 and N97 poorly just bouncing off reflections, but the N86 – although only dual LED, with the combination of improved sensor, illuminates the scene, though not to the standard of the N82.
However, as pointed out in the AAS podcast by Steve Litchfield, though it can light up the scene a bit more than usual dual LED, it doesn’t freeze it like Xenon, so expect some blurs if you’re taking pictures of say…erm…people…in low light situations.
…..:( Without a Xenon flash it´s not possible to have a great all situation camera.
Category: 3rd edition, Nokia, Nseries, Photos, S60
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.