Here’s some low light photo conditions with the N900; testing out its flash against the N97 and the king of flash, and over 2 years old (absolutely ancient in tech), the N82.
I know I harp on about Xenon, but these set of photos demonstrate yet again why it’s just so good! Real xenon flash as opposed to LED, gives you a higher percentage of good looking photos in a wider range of lighting situations. This is especially useful if you’re taking photos of people.
Nseries in general are fantastic in ample lighting conditions, but only the N82 has ever excelled in dark conditions. The N900 would have been fantastic with Xenon. [Note, good low light isn't all about Xenon, but it gives it a mighty helping hand]
There are excuses of space, possibility of advantages of LED for video light (though you don’t have video light option in N900) – possibly the real reason is that the N900 is only stage 4/5 on the path to Maemo greatness. (I really don’t want the N87 to be the only xenon flash enabled phone in Nokia’s 2010 lineup)
In general day to day camera use, I prefer the N900 to the N97 (but N82 above N900)
The N900, though not photo centric does have some advantages on its side:
- Camera interface is just so much easier to use!
- 16:9 photo option
- N900 remembers last saved photo settings
- N900 low light without flash is better than N97/N82
- N900 colours/white balance usually more accurate than N97
- N900 doesn’t have the camera glass fault that some N97s do mucking up the photos when
- N900 video absolutely superior with initial autofocus
- Framing subjects much nicer on N900 with large, high res screen.
1. This first set is just a colour test: Under fluorescent lighting, no flash, distance about 20cm. Beginning always with N97, N900 then N82.
2. Pitch black, flash on.
3. Light on, no flash, distance about 1 metre. Apologies for the messiness of the shelves.
Pitch black, flash on. Distance 1m
Note here: N900 has much sharper photo than N97
Light on, flash on, distance 1m
Pitch black, flash on, distance 2-3 metres.
Now just N900 vs N82
Low light, flash on.
Low light, flash on
Low light, no flash
A bad shot below by N82′s standards (got focus point wrong), but still more vibrant colours. Check out another photo set with N97 vs N82.
Note, in some situations (like macro – not shown) N82′s xenon can be too bright. I’m not a photography buff so I don’t know how it works, but some digital cameras I’ve tried (mostly the Fuji variety, Samsungs/Panasonics I’ve tried failed) they take excellent macro with xenon
About the Author (Author Profile)Hey, thanks for reading my post. My name is Jay and I'm a medical student at the University of Manchester. When I can, I blog here at mynokiablog.com and tweet now and again @jaymontano. We also have a twitter and facebook accounts @mynokiablog and Facebook.com/mynokiablog. Check out the tips, guides and rules for commenting >>click<< Contact us at tips(@)mynokiablog.com or email me directly on jay[at]mynokiablog.com
Sites That Link to this Post
- Comparativa de fotografías: N97 vs N900 vs N82 | Nokia N900 | December 13, 2009
- 8 Reasons to Love the Nokia N8 | My Nokia Blog | April 29, 2010
- Nokia N8 Sample Pics: With and without Xenon Flash | My Nokia Blog | June 15, 2010
- Mobile phone spec sheets: What do they mean? - CABLE TYPES – CABLE TYPES | October 4, 2011
- Mobile phone spec sheets: What do they mean? - LATEST MOBILE PHONES–PRICES-FEATURES – LATEST MOBILE PHONES–PRICES-FEATURES | October 4, 2011
- Mobile phone spec sheets: What do they mean? | ASIAGSM | October 4, 2011
- Mobile phone spec sheets: What do they mean? | Kios Buku Gema (Gemar Membaca)™ | October 5, 2011