“Hating Nokia 101″ Class – Lesson 1 – Unleashing the iTrolls and Fandroids
The bastion of everything that is Anti-Nokia can be found most strongly in one of two places. Either Gizmodo or Engadget. Gizmodo is a blatant all out hate for Nokia whilst Engadget is that devious asswipe that tries to make sly little digs at you at every possible moment whilst trying to seem impartial and objective. I joked earlier about a “I hate Nokia 101″ class, suggesting that a so called “analyst” attended one in order to come up with such a ridiculous article.
I wouldn’t be surprised though if either of those two big blogs aren’t trolling Nokia fans and creating more Anti-Nokia feeling on purpose. Engadget’s latest Nokia related posts insinuates that Nokia is burning money through their massive Research and Development budget. They have not seen (or refuse to see) where exactly Nokia’s investments are going, making a cheap jab for the currently very easy target, Symbian.
“Our initial reaction to the Bernstein Research chart above is to wonder what value Nokia’s massive R&D spending has achieved. Sadly, that’s our second and third reaction, too, having spent some time with the company’s Symbian OS.”
Bigger R&D budget than Apple and HTC? Must be a bad thing! Where’s all your budget going Nokia? It’s like as if
- Nokia isn’t still the global leader as a phone manufacturer
- Nokia isn’t selling the most smartphones by a single manufacturer
- Nokia does not have a huge distribution channel to pump out what, HALF A BILLION phones in 2010 (453M)
- Nokia does not cater for every segment, LOW, Mid, High.
- Nokia produces only phones
- Nokia does not produce the infrastructure, radio technologies, cellular networks (e.g. LTE).
As @everythingblaxx says:
- Nokia Siemens Networks accounts for $2 billion of their R&D spending
- Navteq another $400 million. Remove that $2.4 billion from the equation and now they’re below Samsung’s R&D spending.
- Well, I shouldn’t be surprised that Engadget is engaging in more of their patented “Lowest common denominator” reporting style
So Lesson 1: Unleashing the iTrolls and fandroids
Due to Nokia’s lacklustre presence in the US, that MUST of course reflect the situation in the rest of the world, and so for those based on Engadget’s home soil, it is thus very easy to sympathise with their loathing for Nokia.
1) Find article with remote Anti Nokia Sentiment.
2) Ramp up that Anti-Nokia feeling and cut out anything that could give the other side of that story to let readers make their own decision
3) After leaving enough bait, unleash the iTrolls and google fanboys to comment which in turn should drive in the Nokians.
4) Done. Let flame war sizzle for a while. Let traffic drive in.
If you’re an iTroll or fandroid, you are privileged with the +50 ability of making comments completely unrelated to the article. By default, your commenting ground is already scattered with “They should use Android”, “They should use WP7″ although it always helps to repeat it. OS Flame wars are awesome.
There are many valid discussions being exchanged with Pro or Anti Nokia feeling, but too often these threads are filled to the brim with astonishing inaneness you’d expect to be lingering in a YouTube comments. It just leads you to think, “ARE YOU FREAKIN THICK OR WHAT?” or what ever indignant phrase of your choice.
Some notable comments I read (many more but must dash to lectures).
JJO12
The ignorance displayed by Engadget on this post and some of the commenters on here is AMAZING.
However I’m not surprised, since having the editors roll their eyes towards anything Nokia is nothing new. It must be part of their new hipster trend these days I guess.
Research & Development goes WAY beyond Nokia making “just a phone”. This goes for any corporation.
Like someone stated earlier, some of the technologies we have today in both cellular networks and mobile phones are thanks in part due to Nokia.
So the next time you make a call or send a text message on your generic plastic Android device or sip on your latte sitting in Starbucks while playing Angry Birds on your iPhone while huddled over your iPad watching Netflix via 3G, remember how it was all possible.
akkual
You develop small things, you get your revenue quickly.
You develop big things, you get your revenue years later.
This was the case with Nokia in early 1980s. People here in Finland mocked Nokia for consuming excessive amounts of money on stupid big phones, you could use for 10 minutes once a day with batteries of that time. Well, where are we now? I left this one to you to figure out.
Nokia has its problems at the moment. But those problems are not on the R&D. Actual market share problems are more due to the big un-agile company that can slowly react to demands of markets. Few bad choices have been made and Nokia is paying the price of those… but if Nokia now would dump its R&D and concentrate only to bring an iPhone-killer, it would lose its long term focus.. and it would lose its own game.
…
It is not just smartphone UI’s like Symbian or MeeGo, its everything.
I mean, flexible circuit boards, flexible and/or better batteries, printed pcbs, stacked 3d ICs, new materials for casings, housings, new touchscreen materials, more environmental friendly productions, marketing, economy etc. etc.
Software development methods, frameworks, AI, new software concepts, mobile games, UIs, user friendliness…
Energy harvesting, different energy sources, super energy efficient silicon, etc…
Network protocols, nfc, sensor networks, physical peer-to-peer networks, local p2p adhoc networks..
And these are just a small hint I know about Nokia’s R&D.
Nokia has R&D practically on all areas that are studied e.g. in technical universities such as Berkeley or MIT.
I work on Finnish university and see a lot Nokia funded projects. There are easily over ten new companies spinned off from Nokia funded projects per year around my geographical area. Nokia fills its “society” responsibilities and not only just investors requirements.
Update: Engadget at it again – http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/04/nokia-releases-symbian-update-for-n8-c7-and-c6-01-its-not-the/ How is it possible for the likes of Slashgear and PCWorld to pick up even amounts of news on Nokia be it good or bad, but there seems to be some kind of filter on Engadget? Oh Vlad, you wonderful Troll you. I still miss how you hated on the N8′s “very stiff” shutter button because you were too much of an idiot to realise like point and shoot digicams, it had half button press for autofocus.
I mean, flexible circuit boards, flexible and/or better batteries, printed pcbs, stacked 3d ICs, new materials for casings, housings, new touchscreen materials, more environmental friendly productions, marketing, economy etc. etc.
Software development methods, frameworks, AI, new software concepts, mobile games, UIs, user friendliness…
Energy harvesting, different energy sources, super energy efficient silicon, etc…
Network protocols, nfc, sensor networks, physical peer-to-peer networks, local p2p adhoc networks..
And these are just a small hint I know about Nokia’s R&D.
Nokia has R&D practically on all areas that are studied e.g. in technical universities such as Berkeley or MIT.
I work on Finnish university and see a lot Nokia funded projects. There are easily over ten new companies spinned off from Nokia funded projects per year around my geographical area. Nokia fills its “society” responsibilities and not only just investors requirements.




Anyone have an idea when the N9 is due for release? This year at least maybe?
There are two alternatives:
1. The whole world is anti-Nokia, and Nokia is a superb, cutting-edge company with world-changing products Symbian and Meego) that continues to dominate the smartphone market.
OR
2. Nokia is spiraling down in smartphone share (and feature phones are rapidly becoming Smartphones). Symbian and Meego are as good as dead. Nokia desperately needs a new smartphone OS approach and has done for years but the Nokia corporate wars and fanbois have blinded them to this. Gizmodo and Engadget are just doing their reporting job and pointing out the obvious.
Maybe we should wait until Feb 11 and find out if 1 or 2 are correct? If Elop announces that the plan is to continue full speed ahead on Symbian, Meego, QT etc then I’ll abase myself to the current Nokia temple. If Elop announces that Nokia is going to use Android or Windows Phone 7 then hopefully you fanbois will accept that your stubborn defense of Nokia has been not only wrong but has actually hurt the company by supporting the dinosaurs who favored Symbian, Meego and QT and badly delayed Nokia’s introduction of a proper modern smartphone OS.
I tell you whatever announcement may be, Nokia will stick to Meego+ Symbian and the QT that is on the top of the former two. To buy some time for Meego, WP7 MIGHT be a temporary solution or a long term cooperation as an ALTERNATIVE ONLY.
Symbian is the LEAST OS that Nokia is likely to dump in the near future. We have seen the potential of QT UI on Symbian with yesterday’s bubble app, right? But future will belong to Meego if Nokia are able to deliver it properly…
One technical reason behind this is Win CE ,based on which WP7 and onwards are, is natively under the same umbrella of QT development platform as are Meego and Symbian.
Beside, Nokia have a close tie with Microsoft regarding software development. Remember that recent Symbian and Meego redesign decision using QT/QT quick was heavily influenced by MS actually…
The truth is somewhere between. Nokia has had problems since the terrible N97. The US is their weakest market area, and there are couple of blogs who look things from the US perspective. Well US is great and leading nation in tech world, but they have they own giants like Apple and Google, and they are nationalist too like most of the people are. Combine all this and Nokia does not get the respect it deserves in US or blogs published there, even if its still the market leader in terms of number of smartphone devices sold. Yes, the recent announcement from Catalyst of Android passing Symbian was not true, even if that will happen within 6 months time in 2011 probably.
Conclution, Nokia needs to improve a lot, clarify OS strategy and get back their position in top devices. There are many people thinking Nokia still makes the best phones out there. I just picked C7 over GalaxyS and iPhone 4. For me the latest Symbian feels the best choice. However I admit Nokia is not a clear winner even for me, in the time of N95 a few years ago there was no competition if you wanted the best ‘multimedia phone’ out there.
Nokia will steal the show at MWC with it’s Meego phone.
If there is one thing that Nokia has in common with apple, it is that your phone is made and coded by the same manufacturer.
Android does not have this consistency and it severely harms the end result in terms of having a quality cusomter experience, in my opnion.
Many have said Samsung feels ‘plasticky’ compared to the Nokia N8.
Which reminded me of the fact that many attributed the success of the iPhnoe to it’s design.
Now I dare you to look at the E7 and compare it to your iPhone 4 or Samsung Galaxy and have an honest, unbiased, side-by-side review of it’s design and tell me which you like best..
Some people may say Nokia’s UI is old, yet for over a billion people in the world it is a trusted interface, one they recoqnize and feel comfortable with when upgrading to their next device. The numbers prove thatis exactly what they are doing.
A good 400 million people MORE decided to buy a Nokia phone than an iPhone. 170 million people more than Samsung decided to go with Nokia.
Don’t underestimate the importance of a consistantly predicable user expeience. The Symbian OS is vastly underrated.
[...] this post a while back, quote from @everythingblaxx again (referring to 2010 R&D numbers found by [...]
[...] this post a while back, quote from @everythingblaxx again (referring to 2010 R&D numbers found by [...]