I got contacted by John, communications director with Nokia in Espoo. John had a video of Stephen Elop’s actual comments about Skype.
There was some confusion that day from another source that ended up with a different conclusion from the meeting. Our reader Janne tried to clear it up in a post below.
The only thing that could possibly really clear it up would be perhaps other attendees confirming what happened or possibly the video of the AGM meeting. This is the transcript (Verbatim) of the video that is currently rendering. Looking at Janne’s write up and the transcript, this seems more in line, no?
Stephen Elop: So, thank you for your question about Skype. Indeed, Microsoft did buy the Skype company as part of the ecosystem that comes with Windows Phone and Windows and so forth, so that’s quite correct. The feedback from operators is they don’t like Skype, of course, because for those operators who have a traditional wire-line business, traditional telephone business, it could take away from revenues.
And, so what MSFT has done – and we’ve been part of these conversations as well with operators – is as you correctly say, if operator doesn’t want Skype installed on a Windows Phone from Nokia or any other company, then the operator can make that decision.
Now, you’re right: it can be circumvented. But of course it’s on all Android devices, it’s on iPhone devices, it’s on iPad, it’s on all of those devices. So in fact what we’re doing with the operators is turning it around into an advantage. Instead of them just complaining about Skype on Android or Skype on iPhone, with Microsoft and Nokia, we can have a conversation that says “ok there, is this Skype thing, is there a different type of partnership we can do that recognizes that voice over IP like Skype is coming no matter what, but maybe we can do something creative that generates incremental revenue for you.” Some operators are looking at bundling Lumia, Skype and their own services with higher-bandwidth allotments to actually charge the consumer more and generate more revenue for them. So by actually controlling the Skype asset, we can begin a conversation about how we can have a better Skype-based relationship, which was impossible for operators to do before. So it’s actually quite a bit more advanced than whether operators like or don’t like Skype; they actually want to engage in a conversation about what does this mean and how could we do something that we couldn’t do before. Thank you.
Cheers John for the tip!
About the Author (Author Profile)Hey, thanks for reading my post. My name is Jay and I'm a medical student at the University of Manchester. When I can, I blog here at mynokiablog.com and tweet now and again @jaymontano. We also have a twitter and facebook accounts @mynokiablog and Facebook.com/mynokiablog. Check out the tips, guides and rules for commenting >>click<< Contact us at tips(@)mynokiablog.com or email me directly on jay[at]mynokiablog.com
Sites That Link to this Post
- What Stephen Elop Really Said About Skype And Carrier Relations | WMPoweruser | May 7, 2012
- Nokia: Transcript of Stephen Elop on Skype | WP7 Connect | May 7, 2012
- [UPDATE] Nokia: ‘Providers weren Lumia door Skype’ | Tech-nieuws | May 7, 2012
- Simkl Blog » Blog Archive » Why Skype might help, not hurt, Windows Phone and Nokia with carriers | May 10, 2012