Reuters: Accenture buys Nokia Siemens IPTV assets

| October 1, 2012 | 33 Replies

 

NSN are getting a little bit of cash from Accenture who are buying IPTV assets to launch video services companies at a low cost.

17 NSN employees would transfer over to Accenture. Another deal with Belgacom would mark the exit of Nokia Siemens from IPTV business. Belgacom is also expected to acquire certain IPTV assets and approximately 25 NSN employees.

Source: Reuters

Cheers Viipottaja for the tip!

Category: Nokia

About the Author ()

Hey, thanks for reading my post. My name is Jay and I'm a medical student at the University of Manchester. When I can, I blog here at mynokiablog.com and tweet now and again @jaymontano. We also have a twitter and facebook accounts @mynokiablog and  Facebook.com/mynokiablog. Check out the tips, guides and rules for commenting >>click<< Contact us at tips(@)mynokiablog.com or email me directly on jay[at]mynokiablog.com

Comments (33)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. IloveMS_gounderNokia says:

    Wow, we have gradually achieve our aim
    When you are in the MS Corporate world I think Accenture and MS are closely connected.

    It might be their sub division , like Navtech is to Nokia.

    Already we are considering breaking up Nokia cos the move we plan is not making any financial sense.

    Look closely on maps.nokia.com. The right reserved are to both Nokia and Microsoft.
    We are buying Nokia small and small right under everyone’s nose.

  2. Spbond says:

    Symbian dropped
    Meego dropped
    Meltemi dropped
    Qt sold
    Vertu sold
    Factories closed
    NSN sold

    WHATS COMIN NEXT ELOP????

  3. noki says:

    “Nokia connecting IP to some else.”

    Nokia is becoming less and less relevant.

    • twig says:

      Not according to the news.

    • Jay Montano says:

      “Nokia is becoming less and less relevant.”

      You wish.

      • noki says:

        so selling IP makes it more relevant? NOKIA is becoming nothing more than an OEM.

        • Jay Montano says:

          I am talking about Nokia as a whole and how it is NOT becoming less relevant. The view of Nokia now and one year ago is that they matter.

          Looking at Engadget as an example, where Symbian/Nokia never made much prominence, there’s a whole tab at the very top saying “Nokia Lumia”. I think Nokia is slowly (perhaps too slow) shedding their image of old disposable bricks and actually a genuinely great alternative to the ‘other’ popular phones.

          • yasu says:

            @Jay

            (…)Looking at Engadget as an example, where Symbian/Nokia never made much prominence, there’s a whole tab at the very top saying “Nokia Lumia”. I think Nokia is slowly (perhaps too slow) shedding their image of old disposable bricks and actually a genuinely great alternative to the ‘other’ popular phones.

            And it only cost the modest sum €3.9 billion so far, and an assortment of other troubles (that I will spare you the enumeration ;) ).

            That’s probably why we don’t see eye to eye on the subject: you seem to give too much weight to the blogosphere echo chamber in comparison to what’s happening in the “real” world, and it’s not pretty for Nokia right now. Said in an non antagonistic manner.

            • Jay Montano says:

              Well, your real world is a reflection of that echo chamber years later. I seem to give too much weight, perhaps you don’t give it enough attention.

              • yasu says:

                Well, your real world is a reflection of that echo chamber years later.

                It’s a reflection of decisions taken with putting too much weight to the echo chamber and not enough to market forces and realities, IMO.

                I seem to give too much weight, perhaps you don’t give it enough attention.

                It’s quite possible. One cannot know for sure, can one? What I do know, is that prominence with the likes of Engadget hasn’t paid the Nokia bills so far.

  4. noki says:

    What ever it takes to keep the WP ship on float.

  5. twig says:

    The question is, where they even using it and how much did they get? I can’t think of any profits reported from that division where there?

    Hope they ditch the dividend until a few years in profitability.

  6. twig says:

    I see Apple is ending Ping. Its good Nokia is getting something for iptv rather than just ending it.

  7. viipottaja says:

    Lol.

  8. JGrove303 says:

    So, if Accenture bought into NSN amd gained 12 employees, and Nokia transfered a sizable number of Symbian specialized employees to Accenture as an effort to outsource Symbian (as to not break cobtract with Microsoft) does this,ean Accenture is acting as a kind of Holdings firm? Assets that Nokia can’t use ATM, but might have use in the future? Because this sounds like the money just went in a big loop.

    • viipottaja says:

      The contract with MS does not require Nokia to out source Symbian , nor to stop using it.

      • Tom says:

        How do you know? Have you seen the contract?

        • viipottaja says:

          Having negotiated various multimillion dollar contracts myself and dealt with commercial lawyers I am quite sure the contract Nokia has with MS does not ban the usen of Symbian and most likely of any other OS either. It DOES most likely, however, commit Nokia to using WP a certain number of years and to certain minimum licensing fees etc.

          • rich says:

            They were on a 2 year deal for WP IFIRC

            • JGrove303 says:

              And that deal will be up before ypu know it. And Elop could be out sooner. I hope not though. I wish for all the hardship tp payoff. Maybe some eemployees will get their jobs back.

          • nn says:

            In other words, you don’t know that, you are just assuming that Elop and board wouldn’t be such idiots as to commit Nokia to one smartphone OS vendor. Given what we know now, that seems to be really big assumption.

            What’s funny that regardless of what is in the contract and what exactly “primary smartphone platform” means, Elop consciously planned to commit Nokia exclusively to WP anyway and then he executed the plan. In such circumstances it would actually make sense to include the exclusivity in the contract and try to extract some concessions from MS. But then, that assumes Elop wanted to get any concessions from MS in the first place…

            • viipottaja says:

              You are free to think whatever you like. However, Since you don’t know either, I will stick to my thinking – as I said based on my experience -that Nokia and its lawyers stuck to a more conventional commercial approach and typical legal due diligence, positioning and covenants in the agreement.

  9. Muerte says:

    Oh dear. Here we go again. People are really not getting Nokia’s strategy at all! Why are you complaining, when Nokia is focusing on the core assets and actions?

    IPTV never took off, and it was only a dead weight on Nokia’s shoulders. It is an excellent thing that NSN also is transforming to a more agile company. Before you complain about every move Nokia makes, try to find a rational reason behind those actions, before stating that Nokia is doing this because of Microsoft, or other total nonsense. MS has nothing, I mean nothing to do with NSN.

    NSN has been a money-lossing-machine for years (years before Elop or MS deal) and recently we have seen the first glimpse of the true value of this company. It is the leader in 4G/LTE technology, in which they are heavily focusing.

    Excellent job NSN, keep up the good momentum!

  10. ms.nokia says:

    more good news, i hope nokia got paid well or at least gets some royalties,

Leave a Reply